<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Not Divorce- 1 Corinthians 7:10-11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/index.php/do-not-divorce-1-corinthians-710-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/index.php/do-not-divorce-1-corinthians-710-11/</link>
	<description>A Voice of Reason for the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Christ Like</title>
		<link>http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/index.php/do-not-divorce-1-corinthians-710-11/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>More Christ Like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/?p=408#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Leslie McFall has an interesting way to deal with the so-called exception clause in Matthew 19:9 that appears to allow for divorce and remarriage for marriage unfaithfulness. 
He has written a 43 page paper that reviews the changes in the Greek made by Erasmus that effect the way Matthew 19:9 has been translated. I reviewed McFall&#039;s paper at &lt;a href=&quot;http://morechristlike.com/except-for- fornication-clause-of-matthew-19-9/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Except For Fornication Clause of Matthew 19:9&lt;/a&gt;.  I would love to hear some feedback on this position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leslie McFall has an interesting way to deal with the so-called exception clause in Matthew 19:9 that appears to allow for divorce and remarriage for marriage unfaithfulness.<br />
He has written a 43 page paper that reviews the changes in the Greek made by Erasmus that effect the way Matthew 19:9 has been translated. I reviewed McFall&#8217;s paper at <a href="http://morechristlike.com/except-for- fornication-clause-of-matthew-19-9/" rel="nofollow">Except For Fornication Clause of Matthew 19:9</a>.  I would love to hear some feedback on this position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

