<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word Biblical Commentary &#8211; Strange Layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/index.php/word-biblical-commentary-strange-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/index.php/word-biblical-commentary-strange-layout/</link>
	<description>A Voice of Reason for the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:07:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/index.php/word-biblical-commentary-strange-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christianmonthlystandard.com/?p=1288#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>I hate WBC&#039;s layout. However, they have quality scholarship. Wenham&#039;s two volumes on Genesis are great as well as Hartley&#039;s commentary on Leviticus. Williamson on Ezra-Nehemiah and Dillard on 2 Chronicles are rated very highly. I do not have them, but I have heard amazing things about Cline&#039;s two volumes on Job!

Bad layout, but it is worth the trouble!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate WBC&#8217;s layout. However, they have quality scholarship. Wenham&#8217;s two volumes on Genesis are great as well as Hartley&#8217;s commentary on Leviticus. Williamson on Ezra-Nehemiah and Dillard on 2 Chronicles are rated very highly. I do not have them, but I have heard amazing things about Cline&#8217;s two volumes on Job!</p>
<p>Bad layout, but it is worth the trouble!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
